Parsing the Possibilities for NHL Realignment
Sometimes you just have to get away from it all, unplug completely and give yourself a true break from the world. I came back from a camping trip over the Memorial Day weekend that took me completely out of the loop for three full days. I came back to a plugged-in world where some essential truths had irreparably altered — Jim Tressel was no longer the coach of the Buckeyes after resigning amidst growing scandal and intrigue in Columbus. Some truths were inevitably confirmed — Barcelona was the new Champions League kings after dismantling Manchester United at Wembley in a regal display befitting the club containing the lion’s share of the World Cup champion squad along with the world’s best player. Some tough lessons had been learned — J.R. Hildebrand abdicated his coronation with a rookie mistake into the final turn, handing Dan Wheldon the jug of milk in the winner’s circle and riding the wall to runner-up status.
Some things had stayed the same. Novak Djokovic just kept winning, still undefeated in 2011 as he marched through the draw at the French Open. So did Sebastian Vettel, who with his win in Monaco has taken five of the first six races of the Formula 1 season and is running away with the title before the season even really begins. And Alberto Contador completed his dominance of the Giro d’Italia with a top-three finish in the Sunday time trial into Milan, winning another grand tour whose ultimate place in the record books remains in doubt as the Court of Arbitration for Sport vacillates in its decision on his fate in the clenbuterol case to end all clenbuterol cases.
And you know what? I was perfectly happy reading about all these things after the fact, only getting a taste of the energy that had dissipated with time and the next round of the cycle. I had no qualms about having taken my three steps back in the lather-rinse-repeat news cycle. The incessant drone perpetuates itself to the point where sometimes I think the juiced-up phone left charging on my nightstand is broadcasting news from the vortex via osmosis in those few hours of sleep I manage to soak up most nights. Sure, we were left huddled around a fire when it was dry and around the pop-up enclosure when the omnipresent rainclouds decided to drop their payload once again. But despite the meteorological conspiracy on the first long weekend I’d had away in a long time, I managed to come back with a clearer mind. And though I was sore as hell after multiple nights sleeping close to the ground, I was nevertheless refreshed after having stepped out of the info-river.
The stories seemed interesting, no doubt, but as I read through things the big-picture stories seemed few and far between. Tressel’s departure was a long time coming, and the revelations are nothing new for anybody that has followed college football with any fervent depth and for any appreciable length of time. Hildebrand simply wasn’t destined to be the first rookie driver to take the Brickyard in its centennial campaign. And all the winners who had just kept on winning brought little in the way of shock value.
The resonant story upon my return, at least for this child of the snow and the ice, was that Canada was getting a seventh NHL team once again. After the sale of the Thrashers, Atlanta was a hockey orphan once more as a second major-league franchise packed its bags and left Georgia for the Great White North. Many writers more dialed in than myself have already chimed in on the subject, but the one thing that seems most interesting to me is the way divisions will now align with another decidedly Western team in the league.
Next year the Winnepeg Jets/insert name here franchise will play out a regular Atlanta schedule as the oddest possible member of the “Southeast Division”. (For some reason the NHL is of the mindset that the summer doesn’t afford the necessary time to manipulate schedules to prevent such great travel disparity.) But after that realignment is destined to take place. And with my mind firmly on the future while simultaneously giddy and itchy as my personal playoff beard provided some semblance of karmic assistance in the Canucks’ late-game heroics against Boston in the first game of the Stanley Cup finals, now is the time to think about the best way to create new conference and divisional structure for hockey.
The simplest solution would be merely geographical. Where do the best fault lines draw? That is the most vexing problem, with clusters of teams that naturally match up against one another and wide spaces in between, especially for the Western Conference. After staring at the map for a while, three options appear most viable:
OPTION 1: PATH OF LEAST RESISTANCE
This requires little lost sleep for the NHL, with the rivalries of the past decade for the most part maintained. Under this option, three simple shifts realign things with little disturbance to the landscape as it existed before the sale.
The newest Canadian franchise is given domestic brethren with whom they can naturally rival, entering the Northwest Division and forming a bloc with Vancouver, Calgary, Edmonton and the token American presence in Colorado. Under this scenario the Minnesota Wild would shift from the Northwest to the Central Division, where they can reprise the days of the Norris Division when the old North Stars were competing against the Blackhawks and Blues and Red Wings with regularity. And to replace Atlanta in the Southeast and clear room for Minnesota’s move, the Nashville Predators would move to the Eastern Conference and a more natural geographic fit.
This scenario allows for three divisions to shift with little interruption of normalcy, the other three left completely untouched by the cutting. Would it shock me if our standings looked like this in the near future?:
| PACIFIC | NORTHWEST | CENTRAL | SOUTHEAST | ATLANTIC | NORTHEAST |
| Anaheim
Dallas Los Angeles Phoenix San Jose |
Calgary
Colorado Edmonton Vancouver Winnipeg/MB |
Chicago
Columbus Detroit Minnesota St. Louis |
Carolina
Florida Nashville Tampa Bay Washington |
New Jersey
NY Islanders NY Rangers Philadelphia Pittsburgh |
Boston
Buffalo Montreal Ottawa Toronto |
No, I wouldn’t be surprised in the least. In fact, it might be more shocking to see something more varied than this. But Gary Bettman has floated ideas as radical as shifting Detroit from the Western Conference to the East, so I kept going to see what might seem at first glance more convoluted but upon longer examination might just be the smarter move…
OPTION 2: THE DETROIT SOLUTION
If Gary Bettman is intent on seeing the Red Wings move conferences — and it could make for an interesting power shift — the divisions will become much more malleable. A move of such import would likely be with the intention of reviving the old Detroit-Toronto rivalries of yesteryear. In such a scenario Nashville would remain in the Central Division, and pretty much every other division would see restructuring.
Once again Winnipeg’s franchise would land in the Northwest Division. This time, though, it would be Minnesota instead of Colorado remaining in the division. Working in a more salient geographical pattern, Colorado would be included in the Pacific Division (Denver being a more sensible representative of the Pacific than Dallas, as the Buffaloes and Longhorns can attest) and Dallas would move to the Central to take Detroit’s place in that division.
In the Eastern Conference, that would leave things open for Detroit and Toronto to form the axis of a Midwest Division of sorts encompassing them along with the Penguins, Sabres and Senators. In such a scenario it would be a pure cannibalism of traditional division affiliations. Washington would be joined by Philadelphia in the Atlantic Division with the other remnants of the Southeast, and the New York/New Jersey trio would turn northward to join Boston and Montreal in the Northeast Division. It would look something like this:
| PACIFIC | NORTHWEST | CENTRAL | SOUTHEAST | ATLANTIC | NORTHEAST |
| Anaheim
Colorado Los Angeles Phoenix San Jose |
Calgary
Edmonton Minnesota Vancouver Winnipeg/MB |
Chicago
Columbus Dallas Nashville St. Louis |
Carolina
Florida Philadelphia Tampa Bay Washington |
Buffalo
Detroit Ottawa Pittsburgh Toronto |
Boston
Montreal New Jersey NY Islanders NY Rangers |
This would naturally change the dynamic of many rivalries — both the modern and the historic. Two traditional rivals would play with greater frequency, leaving just the Blackhawks to represent the Original Six in the Western Conference. Despite the more radical redistricting, it would result in lowered travel time and costs for pretty much every team, allowing most to live within one time zone instead of just for the staid traditional power base.
OPTION 3: GEOGRAPHICAL SOLUTIONS
But if the NHL is going to go redrawing things radically, they might as well go all-out on the project. To spread some of the Canada love more between the divisions, Vancouver would shift to the Pacific Division. Colorado and Minnesota would join the other Western Canadian teams in the Northwest. The Central is where it gets interesting, as not Detroit but Toronto shifts conferences and becomes Western. In this scenario not one but two teams would move from West to East.
Dallas and Nashville, two bastions of southern pride, stop deluding themselves and become part of the Southeast Division. Washington returns to its rivalries in the Atlantic, and only the Islanders are forced to move to the Northeast under the restructuring. How would that one look?:
| PACIFIC | NORTHWEST | CENTRAL | SOUTHEAST | ATLANTIC | NORTHEAST |
| Anaheim
Los Angeles Phoenix San Jose Vancouver |
Calgary
Colorado Edmonton Minnesota Winnipeg/MB |
Chicago
Columbus Detroit St. Louis Toronto |
Carolina
Dallas Florida Nashville Tampa Bay |
New Jersey
NY Rangers Philadelphia Pittsburgh Washington |
Boston
Buffalo Montreal NY Islanders Ottawa |
Under this plan m0re shifting would occur, but geography would be best served and made as equitable as possible in what is admittedly a fractious hockey landscape.
Whichever plan the NHL goes with, though — whether identical to or at least in a similar in intention — it will be with one of these three sentiments in mind. So look out, because after a year toiling in the Southeast this newly relocated franchise in Manitoba is going to be more than ready to pass the buck to another team to go play an Eastern Conference schedule…
TAGS: atlanta, Atlantic, Central, divisions, hockey, Manitoba, nhl, Northeast, Northwest, Pacific, realignment, relocation, Southeast, Southeast Division, Thrashers, Winnepeg




7 Comments
In Plan 2, you forgot to put New Jersey into the Northeast Division. Otherwise, you're losing a team when you shouldn't be… Personally, I prefer Option 2. That way, you don't have much movement at all and you can realign the divisions quietly and with no problems.
Thanks. It's corrected now…
As for the least disruptive options, the first would serve that purpose. You'd have to realign all the Eastern divisions to make the second option work. It would be interesting to see if the NHL would be willing to kill Detroit's long Western affiliations to try to buttress older history by following the second plan…
option 3, the caps can be where they were meant to be again.
You missed the most obvious choice of team to move to the East, assuming Phoenix doesn't move to an eastern city, that being Columbus. Nashville is in the Central Time Zone and the Eastern Conference teams will not want to play more games outside their time zone. Detroit, although in the Eastern Time Zone, is one of only 2 original 6 teams in the West, so the league will want to keep them with Chicago. Also the Western Conference teams like the big crowds when the Red Wings are in town. Columbus is in the Eastern Time Zone so the Eastern Conference teams will like that and Columbus has played very well against Eastern Conference teams the past few years, so it will help them out.
Columbus presents an interesting option for movement as well. You could very easily replace them for Detroit in any situation where the Red Wings are shown moving to the Eastern Conference. In any of the cases they would provide an equivalent geographical match… and yes, as you aptly pointed out, they would also have the benefit of being in the Eastern time zone.
Option 1 or 2 should be used. It only makes sense to keep the 3 NYC teams together. option 2 would need a few name changes. Detroit= Atlantic? i dont think so
Naturally, names would be altered to fit the proper tenor of the divisions. These are just representative of the current setup and how switches would occur. But hopefully Bettman and crew will recognize the need to clarify division names in any realignment…